The Two-Way-Street
of Compassion and Benevolence
The other day I was engaged in an email discussion with a
colleague. He had just given me a
copy of The Art of Compassion, an edited
book of stories printed by Faith Books in 2009. I read parts of the book and skimmed the rest. I told my colleague that the book
prompted considerable thought and it strengthened my resolve about the
importance of seeing compassion as a Two-Way-Street of help and benevolence. I went on to say…
As much as I support the giving of compassion, care, help,
empathy and gifts of music, for instance, each requires a receiver. It is
hard to show compassion or love when there is nobody to receive it. There
must be some "person", to receive our gifts. Am I suggesting
that we middle class folks need the “needy”? Well, sort of but this isn't
where I want to go.
Those of us who are productive in satisfying ways, do not
typically ask these questions. It
does not occur to us. Our employer
reciprocates what we give with a paycheck. Our spouses and friends and maybe our co-workers ask us
questions and favors and seem pleased with our replies and contributions -- as
a matter of daily life.
But who, with regularity, asks the poor for their wisdom?
Who thinks of asking older adults for help with an important new project?
Rich or poor, young or old, our personal sense that we are
making meaningful contributions to life is a mainstay of our well-being, (which
is in turn related to our health and happiness). So without people who will give appreciative acknowledgement
for the compassion we express or the help we give, we can spiral down toward a
dismal perception of not mattering to others.
So it seems to me that we must help people grow in
understanding that being open to the help and compassion from others is, in an important way, a gift
to them. It is a way of giving
“help” by receiving help. It
demands, of course, that we express appreciation and thanks for that help
given.
Perhaps it isn’t immediately apparent what another person
can do or say that can be meaningful to us (and to them). But the point I am making is that when
we take the time to figure that out – and ask them for “help” in that realm, we
are being compassionate, kind and helpful by contributing to their
psychological well-being.
Thus, ongoing positive relationships are never one-way
streets of one person only giving help and
the other only receiving help. To
sustain positive relationships over time requires a two-way street in which all parties both give help (or compassion) and
receive help (or compassion).
Here is a true story that I have shared before, but it
sums up what I am trying to say:
A story from a Black minister of an inner-city
church in Texas
A number of years ago I was approached by a
group of middle class women from a church in the suburbs of my city. They wanted to know if they could give
some of their old clothes directly to the women of my church – “Would the women
of the church appreciate that?” , they asked. I checked with the women’s groups in my church and they were
delighted.All went well for quite a time, the suburban women were pleased with what they were doing, the inner-city women were happy and gave many thanks to the suburban women for their gifts.
One day the inner-city women decided that they would like to do something nice back to the suburban woman and they asked me to check with those women and see what would be meaningful to them. A few days later I had to report back to the women in my congregation with the disappointing news that the suburban could think of nothing they wanted from the women of my church. The women in my church were crushed. They thought about rejecting further clothes, but decided to accept the clothes but no longer give thanks.
The suburban woman
became upset over time because they no longer were being appreciated. Eventually the suburban women were the
ones who stopped the program. They
never had a clue about the real problem.
They thought they were doing good.
Bruce
What kind thing could the women from the inner city do for another group of people who may have needs as well that cannot be paid back? The idea is not to 'pay back' the kindness with kindness but to pass along to others the same kindness given to them. They really did not need to feel offended because the other woman's group 'felt' they had no need that the other group could do something in return for them. Do I give a poor man a dollar and then ask something in return or just give with the hope that I have contributed to his life? Otherwise we need to find ways to pay God back as well beyond our thankfulness and gratitude. I say give thanks to those who want to bless and then pass on the love to others who have needs...and on it goes
ReplyDeleteDear Scott,
DeleteWonderful point. You may have seen this video floating around facebook;
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?v=381305535298974
It is titled “A video that will change your life.” It makes the same point you do for giving back the goodness we notice in ways that make sense to us, as you say, “…to pass along to others the same kindness given to [us].”
The point made in the inner city story that you read is that those inner city women felt a special calling to do something nice for those woman who had given them clothes – but their interest in doing so was rejected by the suburban women. You and I can look at that real-life dynamic and ask why didn’t those inner city women who appreciated those used clothes do something nice for others in their own neighborhood instead of trying to do something nice for those wealthier women in the suburbs?
But they didn’t. For whatever reason, they were empowered to “give back” across economic “lines” but their attempts to do that were rejected. Therein lies the tragedy of this story. I suppose that one possible lesson the inner city women learned was to “stick to their own kind” next time they want to do something nice. As I read the Gospel, this is not the lesson I hear.
Bruce